Become a fan on Facebook!
Follow me on Twitter!
Give me a review on Yelp!
This office serves clients in real estate transactions
of all types. I also assist clients with estate planning for everyone, including the GLBT community, and represent Illinois
condominium associations as needed. I help real estate investors who are renting their properties deal with difficult renter
issues, and I advocate for renters dealing with difficult landlords.
I work with clients in Chicago and all over the Chicagoland area, including
Wilmette, Skokie, Morton Grove, Plainfield, Wheaton, Glencoe, Lake Forest, Naperville, Oak Park, Winnetka, Des Plaines, Orland
Park, Berwyn, Carol Stream, Arlington Heights, Crystal Lake, Barrington, Palatine, Park Ridge, Gurnee, South Holland, Park
Forest and more.
My goal is to give each
and every client personal, friendly and competent service at a reasonable price. I also strive to use technology in the best
way possible to keep my clients informed.
My legal background includes working for a major Chicago developer and
working for a boutique firm in their real estate division. I am also a landlord of a three flat building in Rogers Park and
I am managing broker of a small real estate brokerage.
I work with all different types of clients, including
developers, first-time buyers, buyers of second (or third!) homes, all sellers and the LGBTQ community.
My real estate blog is below. Please make sure to check back on a regular
basis to check out what's new. I update my blog about once a week and welcome any questions that you may have.
Ask me too about help with personal injury, divorce,
and any other legal issues!
Greenview Drive, Crystal Lake, IL 60014
Recommend my site by clicking here!
Check out my interview, Expert
Advice on Buying a Foreclosed Home on Illinois Homes, one of the top sites
for Illinois homes for sale, including Wheaton,
IL real estate. Illinois Homes also services Michigan homes for sale and Pennsylvania homes for sale.
Monday, June 27, 2011
Homeless Chicago Family Moves Into Foreclosed Home
4:09 pm cdt
From today's NY Times:
In a giggly voice, a small homeless girl
with blue-framed glasses chased her younger brother and sister around the front porch of a long-deserted two-flat on the
South Side, chanting, “Fight, fight, fight, ’cause housing is a human right.”
Jimmya Biggs, 10, and her siblings learned the chant — a nursery rhyme for the age of foreclosure
— from a group of low-income-housing advocates, the Chicago Anti-Eviction Campaign. In a well-planned and orchestrated
event on June 17, the campaign moved the children, their single mother and her teenage sister into the foreclosed building
to bring attention to what the co-founder of the group, Willie J. R. Fleming, called the “twin evils” of homelessness
Just a few weeks earlier, the children and their mother, Martha
Biggs, 34, had been living in the family minivan, doing their homework and saying their prayers in the dim glow of a dome
“At the Anti-Eviction Campaign, we decided to play matchmaker and
put homeless people into people-less housing,” Mr. Fleming said at a news conference on the front lawn of the two-flat.
But the family could soon become homeless again. The group does not own the red
brick building in the middle of the 6700 block of South Prairie Avenue. It has been in legal limbo for about two years, vacant
and abandoned by its owner, Stacy Hill, a schoolteacher who is exhausted by negotiations with banks and lawyers for a mortgage
modification, said Ms. Hill’s mother, who gave the group the keys to the house. Ms. Hill found it increasingly difficult
to maintain her mortgage payments because she had problems keeping tenants.
Bank National Trust Company filed a foreclosure suit against the owner in 2009. Neither bank officials nor Ms. Hill, who
has since moved to Philadelphia, would comment.
“She couldn’t get
any relief,” said Ms. Hill’s mother, Pat Hill, executive director of the African American Police League and a
supporter of the Anti-Eviction Campaign. “The banks were too big to fail and got bailed out. What about the people?”
The Anti-Eviction Campaign chose the two-flat because it was one of at least
1,700 foreclosure actions temporarily halted in Cook County after Fisher & Shapiro, the law firm handling the cases on
behalf of the banks, self-reported to Circuit Court officials three months ago that documents in some of the cases had been
altered. Many foreclosure proceedings could be delayed for months.
Ms. Hill filed suit in Federal Court against Fisher & Shapiro, alleging that the firm violated the Fair Debt Collection
Practices Act. The suit seeks class-action status and damages.
Pat Hill said
that her daughter is not fighting to get the building back. “She doesn’t want it any more after all of this,”
Pat Hill said. “As far as we’re concerned, this home belongs to Martha and her kids and the community.”
The law firm’s managing partner, Lee Perres, did not return telephone calls
The only noise coming out of the 101-year-old building for much
of the last two years was the sound of thieves ripping out copper pipes, radiators, ceiling fans, bathroom fixtures and
kitchen appliances. Neighbors feared that another crack house was slowly being born.
Before moving into the two-flat, before sleeping in their car, before wandering from relative to friend like refugees, the
family rented an apartment in a weary West Side building. It, too, was in foreclosure.
When the building changed hands last year, the new owners raised the rent. Working on the line at a hot dog factory, Ms.
Biggs, who grew up in the Cabrini-Green public housing development, said she could not afford it, along with gas and electricity.
“We became homeless,” she said.
Mr. Fleming, the housing advocate,
who also once lived in Cabrini-Green, knew Ms. Biggs and asked her to move into the South Prairie Avenue two-flat to make
a statement and to provide shelter for her children. They both knew it would be risky. The authorities might come banging
on the door and demand she and her family leave. But worse than that, she said, her children’s hearts could be broken
“They love it here,” she said the other day, showing off the
freshly painted rooms and the used dining room set given to her by a neighbor. “This is a blessing. My kids don’t
have to worry about where they’re going to sleep or wash up. What happens next is in God’s hands.”
The group hopes that if the bank assumes ownership, it will allow the family to live
there at a reasonable rent.
Before moving in, Ms. Biggs had to promise Mr. Fleming
she would help repair the building. For six weeks, she worked alongside a skilled handyman, Tommy Tillman, learning how
to put up drywall and install tile and plumbing fixtures.
She took time out to
attend the eighth-grade graduation of her 15-year-old daughter, Jajunna. “She did it even though we were homeless,”
Ms. Biggs said of her daughter. “I’m so proud of her.”
Biggs hung Jajunna’s red cap and crown on a nail in the wall of the sparsely furnished living room.
“For right now,” she said, “that’s all the decoration I need.”
Thursday, June 23, 2011
Magellan Development Starts Another High-Rise Apartment Complex
3:31 pm cdt
My former employer, Magellan Development, has started another high rise apartment development to
cash in on the booming rental market.
GlobeSt.com reportsthat Magellan Development
Group has broken ground on the $150 million Coast at Lakeshore East, a 45-story apartment tower in the company’s
$4 billion mixed-use complex on Lake Michigan. Magellan and JP Morgan Asset Management, an equity partner,
have invested more than $50 million, with another $99 million provided by Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Co.
The new tower will have 499 apartments, 18,000 square feet of retail and a 272-car parking facility.
Amenities will include an outdoor pool, fitness center, media room, indoor spa and more. The project should open for occupancy
by February 2013.
Magellan has already completed a collection of condominium and apartment
towers on the site, with an average occupancy of about 95%. The buildings include the Regatta, Chandler, Tides, Shoreham
and Lancaster, as well as the new Village Market, a 105,000-square-foot retail mall that will include the anchor Mariano’s
James Loewenberg, co-CEO at Magellan, tells GlobeSt.com
that the complex is so immense, and successful, that the company doesn’t pay much attention to the rest of the multifamily
market in Chicago. “We’ve been strong since we started,” he says.
the 28-acre site is only just more than half built-out, he says. Another seven buildings are planned. “When it’s
all done, we should have more than 5,000 units and 15,000 residents on the site, with another two hotels. We’ve got
about 3,000 units now. We’ll see how the Coast goes, but we hope to start the next tower next year,” Loewenberg
Brininstool Kerwin & Lynch designed the Coast. McHugh
Construction Co. is the general contractor.
Wednesday, June 1, 2011
Be Careful When Asked to Co-Sign a Lease!
8:14 pm cdt
The Chicago Tribune just had an article about co-signing a lease for a relative which I am reprinting
below. Be aware that co-signer means that you're as responsible as the primary lessee (or borrower if you are talking about
a mortgage!) and be wary of who you do this for.
Q. I agreed to co-sign a lease for my
nephew. He lost his job, fell behind on the rent and eventually left the rental. But he owes two months' rent, and the landlord
has demanded that I pay up. He's threatening to garnish my wages or attach my bank account. Can he do this?
A. Agreeing to be a co-signer is a significant undertaking. When you did so, you agreed to pay debts that the tenant, your
nephew, failed to pay.
Unless the agreement says otherwise (and most don't, because these agreements are written
by lawyers who are working on behalf of landlords), the landlord won't have to try to get the money first from the tenant,
nor even exhaust the security deposit, before turning to you.
If you are a deep pocket and easy to find, the
landlord will naturally look to you. In fact, savvy landlords won't accept co-signers who are not well-heeled and local
for precisely this reason.
The most problematic consequence for co-signers occurs when the tenant has a defense
to the demand. For example, suppose the tenant moves out, and the landlord claims he has left damage that exceeds the security
deposit. The tenant says that the damage existed when he moved in.
The landlord cannot garnish wages or attach
bank accounts until he has gone to court and obtained a judgment for money damages. But if the tenant does not show up for
court and lets the landlord win by default, or offers a losing defense, your wages and bank accounts will be on the line
if the tenant won't or can't pay.
Of course, skipping town or not vigorously defending the case would be a rotten
thing to do to Uncle Julian. Most tenants who use family as co-signers will do their best to protect their family members.
And savvy landlords know that a family co-signer will exert significant psychological pressure on the tenant to
honor his obligations, which makes such a co-signer a good bet.
Many states want to make very sure that co-signers
understand the extent of their responsibilities when they co-sign a credit contract, loan or vehicle lease.
California requires that the following warning accompany any such contract in which a co-signer is involved:
"You are being asked to guarantee this debt. Think carefully before you do. If the borrower doesn't pay the debt, you
will have to. Be sure you can afford to pay if you have to, and that you want to accept this responsibility. You may have
to pay up to the full amount of the debt if the borrower does not pay. You may also have to pay late fees or collection
costs, which increase this amount.
"The creditor can collect this debt from you without first trying to
collect from the borrower. The creditor can use the same collection methods against you that can be used against the borrower,
such as suing you, garnishing your wages, etc. If this debt is ever in default, that fact may become a part of your credit
record. This notice is not the contract that makes you liable for the debt."
Landlords are not required
to give similar warnings, but there's no logical reason not to. It might scare off some co-signers, but, in the long run,
it will make things easier for a landlord who has to turn to the co-signer to satisfy a tenant debt.